Understanding these fundamental components is essential for working with smart contracts. Each concept forms a critical part of how decentralized applications operate on-chain.
LABS
Guides
Smart Contracts Explained: How Code Runs on Blockchains
A technical explanation of smart contracts, covering their architecture, execution environment, major platforms, and real-world applications for developers.
Chainscore © 2025
key-concepts
FOUNDATIONAL BUILDING BLOCKS
Core Concepts
01
Decentralized Execution
Smart contracts run on a decentralized network of nodes, not a single server. Every node in the network (e.g., Ethereum's 1.2M+ validators) executes the contract code independently and verifies the result against the consensus. This ensures tamper-proof execution and eliminates single points of failure. The outcome is recorded on the blockchain's immutable ledger.
02
Deterministic Code
A smart contract must be deterministic: given the same input and blockchain state, it must always produce the exact same output on every node. This is why Solidity and Vyper lack true randomness and cannot make external HTTP calls. Non-deterministic code would break network consensus. Common patterns like Chainlink VRF provide verifiable randomness by using oracle-delivered data.
03
Gas and Computation Cost
Every contract operation consumes gas, a unit measuring computational work. Simple storage updates cost ~20,000 gas, while complex cryptographic operations can cost millions. Users pay for gas in the network's native token (e.g., ETH, MATIC). This system prevents infinite loops and spam, aligning resource cost with network security. Gas limits per block (e.g., 30M gas on Ethereum) cap network throughput.
04
Immutable & Upgradeable Patterns
Once deployed, a smart contract's code is immutable and cannot be changed. To fix bugs or add features, developers use proxy patterns:
- Proxy Pattern: User interacts with a proxy contract that delegates calls to a mutable logic contract.
- Diamond Pattern: A proxy that routes calls to multiple logic contracts (facets). Upgrades require careful governance, often managed by a multi-signature wallet or DAO vote.
05
State & Storage
Contract state is data persistently stored on-chain, costing ~20,000 gas per 32-byte slot. Key storage types:
- Storage: Permanent, expensive (e.g., user balances).
- Memory: Temporary, for function execution.
- Calldata: Immutable, for function parameters.
- Stack: For small local variables. Efficient data structuring (packing variables, using mappings) is critical for reducing gas costs.
06
Events & Logs
Contracts emit events to log significant actions (e.g., a token transfer). Events are stored as cheap logs on-chain (~8 gas per byte) instead of expensive storage. They are not accessible to other contracts but are indexed and queryable by off-chain applications like front-ends and indexers. This creates an efficient publish-subscribe system for tracking contract activity.
how-it-works
HOW SMART CONTRACTS RUN
Execution Architecture
Smart contracts are not single programs but systems of interacting components. This section breaks down the core architectural layers that enable code execution across different blockchains.
03
Transaction Lifecycle
A contract execution follows a strict path from user intent to state change.
- Transaction Creation: A user signs a transaction with target contract address, calldata, and gas limit.
- Propagation: The transaction is broadcast to the network's peer-to-peer mempool.
- Inclusion: A validator/miner includes it in a block, ordering it among others.
- Execution & Validation: Every network node re-executes the contract code locally, verifying the proposed state change is correct.
- Finalization: After consensus (PoW, PoS), the new state is finalized on-chain.
05
State Management
Smart contracts persistently store data on-chain. Management patterns vary by chain.
- EVM Storage: A key-value store (256-bit to 256-bit) per contract, accessed via
SLOADandSSTORE(expensive). - Memory & Stack: Temporary data areas cleared after execution.
- Account Model: Ethereum uses an account-based model where each contract has its own state.
- UTXO Model: Some smart contract platforms (Cardano, Bitcoin L2s) adapt the Unspent Transaction Output model for state, tracking datum attached to outputs.
06
Execution Environments Compared
Different blockchains implement distinct execution models, affecting developer experience and performance.
| Aspect | EVM (Ethereum) | WASM (Polkadot) | SVM (Solana) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bytecode | Custom EVM bytecode | WebAssembly bytecode | Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) bytecode |
| State Model | Global Merkle Trie | Parachain-specific | Global State via Accounts |
| Parallelism | Sequential | Limited (per core) | Native parallel execution via Sealevel |
| Dominant Language | Solidity | Rust, Ink! | Rust, C |
Solana's Sealevel runtime allows simultaneous non-conflicting transactions, a key scalability difference.
KEY ATTRIBUTES
Smart Contract Platform Comparison
A comparison of leading smart contract platforms by technical architecture, performance, and economic model.
| Feature / Metric | Ethereum | Solana | Arbitrum |
|---|---|---|---|
Consensus Mechanism | Proof-of-Stake | Proof-of-History + PoS | Optimistic Rollup (PoS finality) |
Avg. Block Time | ~12 seconds | ~400 milliseconds | ~0.25 seconds (L2 block) |
Avg. Transaction Fee | $1-10 | < $0.01 | $0.1-0.5 |
Programming Languages | Solidity, Vyper | Rust, C, C++ | Solidity, Vyper (EVM-compatible) |
Throughput (TPS) | ~15-30 | ~2,000-5,000 | ~40,000 (theoretical) |
Finality Time | ~15 minutes (full) | ~13 seconds | ~1 week (challenge period) |
Native Account Abstraction | |||
Dominant Virtual Machine | EVM | Sealevel VM | Arbitrum Nitro (WASM-based) |
use-cases
BEYOND THEORY
Real-World Applications
Smart contracts are not just theoretical constructs. They are the foundational logic for major decentralized applications, automating billions in value across multiple industries.
04
Supply Chain & Logistics
Smart contracts bring transparency and automation to complex supply chains. They can track a product's journey from origin to consumer, with each step recorded immutably. Applications include:
- Provenance tracking for luxury goods and pharmaceuticals.
- Automated payments upon delivery confirmation via IoT sensors.
- Compliance logging for regulatory requirements. Companies like IBM Food Trust use blockchain and smart contracts to reduce fraud and improve efficiency.
99.9%
Immutable Record Accuracy
30-50%
Faster Reconciliation
05
Gaming & Metaverse
In blockchain gaming, smart contracts manage in-game economies and asset ownership. Play-to-earn models rely on contracts to distribute rewards. Key implementations:
- True asset ownership: Players own their items as NFTs, tradable across markets.
- Provably fair mechanics: Random number generation and game logic are transparent.
- Interoperability: Assets from one game can be used in another via shared standards. Games like Axie Infinity and metaverse platforms like Decentraland are built on this foundation.
FROM IDEA TO MAINNET
Development Lifecycle
Smart contract development follows a structured, security-focused process. This lifecycle moves from initial design and testing to deployment and ongoing maintenance on a live blockchain.
The workflow is an iterative cycle focused on security and correctness.
- Specification & Design: Define the contract's purpose, state variables, functions, and access controls. Tools like UML or formal specification languages (e.g., TLA+) can be used.
- Implementation: Write the contract code in a high-level language like Solidity or Vyper, following established patterns from OpenZeppelin Contracts.
- Local Testing: Use a development framework like Hardhat or Foundry to run unit and integration tests on a local blockchain (e.g., Hardhat Network).
- Audit & Formal Verification: Submit code for professional security audits and potentially use tools like Certora for formal verification.
- Testnet Deployment: Deploy to a public testnet (Goerli, Sepolia) for final integration testing and user acceptance.
- Mainnet Deployment & Monitoring: Deploy the verified contract to mainnet (Ethereum, Arbitrum, etc.) and monitor it with tools like Tenderly or OpenZeppelin Defender.
COMMON VULNERABILITIES
Security Risk Matrix
A comparison of critical smart contract vulnerabilities, their impact, and common mitigation strategies.
| Vulnerability | Impact Level | Common Causes | Primary Mitigations |
|---|---|---|---|
Reentrancy | Critical | External calls before state updates | Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern, Reentrancy Guards |
Integer Overflow/Underflow | High | Unchecked arithmetic on uint256 | Use SafeMath libraries, Solidity >=0.8.0 |
Access Control | Critical | Missing or flawed permission checks | Ownable/Roles libraries, explicit modifiers |
Oracle Manipulation | High | Single point of failure for price data | Use decentralized oracles (e.g., Chainlink), circuit breakers |
Front-Running | Medium | Public mempool transaction visibility | Commit-Reveal schemes, private mempools, fair sequencing |
Uninitialized Storage Pointers | High | Pointers referencing unexpected storage slots | Explicit variable initialization, understand storage layout |
Denial of Service (DoS) | Medium-High | Unbounded loops, block gas limit reliance | Gas limit checks, pull-over-push payment patterns |
Timestamp Dependence | Low-Medium | Using block.timestamp for critical logic | Avoid strict equality, use block numbers for time intervals |
tools
PRACTICAL GUIDES
Essential Development Tools
To build and deploy smart contracts, developers rely on a core set of tools for writing, testing, and interacting with code on-chain.
02
Testing Suites
Rigorous testing is non-negotiable for secure smart contracts. Modern tools automate unit, integration, and advanced testing patterns.
- Unit Tests: Verify individual contract functions in isolation.
- Fuzz Testing: Foundry's
forgecan run thousands of random inputs to find edge cases. - Fork Testing: Simulate interactions with mainnet state using tools like Hardhat's network forking.
Comprehensive test coverage is the first line of defense against costly exploits.
03
Deployment & Scripting
Deploying contracts requires managing private keys, gas fees, and network configurations. Scripting tools automate this process.
- Deployment Scripts: Hardhat scripts or Foundry scripts compile and broadcast transactions to a chosen network (testnet/mainnet).
- Environment Management: Use
.envfiles with libraries likedotenvto securely manage private keys and RPC URLs. - Verification: Automatically verify contract source code on block explorers like Etherscan after deployment for transparency.
SMART CONTRACT ESSENTIALS
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to common technical questions about smart contract development, security, and execution on blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon.
A smart contract is a self-executing program stored on a blockchain. It runs deterministically across all network nodes when triggered by a transaction. The execution process involves:
- Deployment: The contract's bytecode is published to the blockchain at a unique address.
- Invocation: A user sends a transaction to the contract's address, calling a specific function.
- Validation & Execution: Network validators run the code locally. They check the logic, update the contract's state (stored data), and enforce rules like access control.
- Consensus: All validators must agree on the output, ensuring the state change is immutable.
Unlike a web server, there is no central point of failure. Execution is powered by gas (EVM) or compute units (Solana), which are fees paid to prevent spam and infinite loops.
resource-links
DEVELOPER REFERENCES
Resources and Documentation
Primary documentation and reference materials used by developers to understand how smart contracts execute, compile, and interact with blockchain state.