When bridging assets across blockchains, users must pay transaction fees (gas) on the destination chain to claim or use their funds. This creates friction, as users need the native token of the new chain upfront, which they may not possess. This overview explores key strategies to manage this critical hurdle.
Managing Gas on the Destination Chain When Bridging
The Core Gas Problem in Bridging
Gas Abstraction (Gasless Claims)
Gas abstraction allows users to complete a bridge transaction without holding the destination chain's gas token. The bridging protocol or a relayer pays the gas fee on the user's behalf, often deducting the cost from the bridged amount or using a different payment method.
- Sponsored Transactions: A third-party (relayer) submits the claim tx, paid via a fee model.
- Pay in Bridged Token: Users pay fees using a portion of the asset they are transferring.
- Use Case: A user bridging USDC to Arbitrum can claim it without first buying ETH, as the bridge covers the gas cost automatically.
Destination Gas Estimation
Accurate gas estimation for the destination chain is crucial to prevent failed transactions and stranded assets. Bridges must dynamically calculate required gas fees, which can fluctuate wildly due to network congestion, and communicate this cost clearly before the user initiates the bridge.
- Real-time Fee Oracles: Integrate data feeds to fetch current gas prices on the target chain.
- Buffer Inclusion: Add a safety buffer to the estimated gas to ensure tx success.
- Why it matters: Without proper estimates, a user might bridge funds to Polygon only to find their MATIC gas estimate was too low, leaving assets stuck.
Native Gas Token Bridging
This involves bridging a small amount of the destination chain's native gas token (e.g., ETH, MATIC, AVAX) alongside the primary asset. This provides the user with the necessary funds to pay for the claim transaction and initial interactions on the new chain.
- Bundled Transfers: The bridge protocol automatically swaps a portion of the main asset for gas or allows a dual-asset transfer.
- Pre-funding Wallets: Users can pre-bridge gas tokens if they plan frequent cross-chain activity.
- Example: Bridging from Ethereum to Avalanche? The bridge can send a small amount of AVAX with your USDC so you can immediately claim and use it.
Unified Liquidity & Gas Solutions
Some advanced bridges maintain unified liquidity pools that combine asset liquidity with gas token reserves. This allows them to offer a seamless experience where gas payment is abstracted away and settled internally across chains, simplifying the user experience to a single approval.
- Cross-Chain Gas Tokens: Protocols may use a universal gas token that works across multiple chains.
- Internal Accounting: Gas costs are settled on the backend via pooled funds.
- Use Case: Using a bridge like Socket or Li.Fi, a user might only sign one transaction, and the protocol handles all gas complexities across the source and destination chains automatically.
User Education & Warnings
Proactively informing users about destination gas requirements is a fundamental mitigation strategy. Clear interfaces should warn users if their destination wallet lacks sufficient gas tokens and provide explicit steps on how to acquire them, preventing confusion and asset stranding.
- Pre-transaction Checklists: UI prompts that verify destination wallet balance for gas.
- Educational Tooltips: Explain why gas is needed on the other side and how to get it.
- Why it matters: A new user might not know they need BNB on BSC; a clear warning and a link to a faucet or on-ramp can prevent a failed experience.
Implementation Strategies for Gas Provisioning
A detailed process for managing and funding gas fees on the destination chain when bridging assets, ensuring transactions can be executed successfully.
Assess Destination Chain Gas Requirements
Research and calculate the estimated gas costs for the target transaction on the destination blockchain.
Detailed Instructions
Before initiating any bridge transaction, you must first quantify the gas expenditure on the destination chain. This involves understanding the target chain's fee model (e.g., EIP-1559 on Ethereum, priority fees on Avalanche) and the specific gas cost for the operation you intend to perform, such as a token swap or NFT mint. Start by using a blockchain explorer or gas estimation API for the destination network.
- Sub-step 1: Identify the target operation's gas limit. For a simple ERC-20 transfer on Ethereum, this might be 65,000 gas, but a complex smart contract interaction could require 200,000+ gas.
- Sub-step 2: Check the current gas price. Use tools like Etherscan's Gas Tracker for Ethereum or equivalent for other chains. Convert this price to the native token (e.g., ETH, MATIC, AVAX).
- Sub-step 3: Calculate total cost. Multiply the gas limit by the current gas price. For example, if the limit is 200,000 units and the gas price is 50 Gwei, the cost is 200,000 * 50 Gwei = 0.01 ETH.
Tip: Always add a 10-20% buffer to your estimate to account for network congestion and price volatility between the time of estimation and transaction execution.
Select and Fund a Gas Relayer or Forwarder
Choose a service or mechanism to pay for gas on the destination chain without holding its native token.
Detailed Instructions
To avoid holding the destination chain's native token, you can utilize a gas relayer or meta-transaction service. These services pay the gas fee on your behalf and are reimbursed in the bridged asset. Key options include native bridge gas services (like Arbitrum's retryable tickets), third-party relayers (like Biconomy), or protocols implementing EIP-2771 for gasless transactions.
- Sub-step 1: Evaluate available relayers. Check if your chosen bridge (e.g., Hop, Across) has a built-in gas abstraction feature. For Arbitrum, retryable tickets are automatically created, requiring you to fund them with ETH on L1.
- Sub-step 2: Fund the relayer contract. If using a third-party service, you may need to deposit funds into their contract. For example, to use Biconomy's Gasless Relayer on Polygon, you would approve and deposit USDC into their
GasTankcontract. - Sub-step 3: Configure transaction parameters. When constructing your bridge call, include the relayer's address and any required signature. For a meta-transaction, your call might be wrapped in a
executeMetaTransactionfunction.
solidity// Example: Initiating a gasless swap via a relayer (pseudo-code) bytes memory data = abi.encodeWithSelector(swapRouter.swapExactTokensForTokens.selector, amountIn, amountOutMin, path, to, deadline); relayerContract.execute(user, contractAddress, data, signature);
Tip: Always verify the relayer's security and fee structure. Some take a percentage of your transaction, while others charge a fixed fee in the gas token.
Bridge Assets with Gas Provisioning
Execute the bridge transaction while ensuring the gas funding mechanism is correctly integrated.
Detailed Instructions
This step involves initiating the cross-chain transfer while embedding gas provisioning instructions. The exact method depends on your chosen strategy from Step 2. For bridges with native support, this is often automatic. For custom setups, you must explicitly include gas payment details in the transaction payload.
- Sub-step 1: Construct the bridge transaction payload. Include the destination chain ID, recipient address, amount, and crucially, the gas limit and gas funding instructions. For example, when bridging via LayerZero, you might set
_adapterParamsto specify extra gas for the destination. - Sub-step 2: Specify the gas payment token. If the bridge allows paying fees in a stablecoin, indicate this. On Celer cBridge, you can select "Pay gas in USDC" at the UI level, which corresponds to setting the
feeTokenparameter in the smart contract call. - Sub-step 3: Execute and monitor. Send the transaction on the source chain. Use the bridge's dashboard or a cross-chain explorer (like LayerZero Scan) to track the message's status. Confirm that the gas provisioning step on the destination is queued or completed.
javascript// Example: Bridging with Stargate with custom gas (simplified) const stargateRouter = new ethers.Contract(routerAddress, abi, signer); await stargateRouter.swap( chainId_dest, // e.g., 101 for Arbitrum poolId_src, poolId_dest, msg.sender, amountLD, amountLDMin, { dstGasForCall: 500000 }, // Gas allocated for a destination contract call "0x", // No payload for a simple transfer "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" // Native ETH for gas );
Tip: The parameter
dstGasForCallis critical. If you are only receiving assets, 0 may suffice. For a contract interaction, estimate carefully to avoid a failed transaction on arrival.
Monitor and Complete the Destination Transaction
Track the bridged assets and ensure the gas-funded transaction executes successfully on the destination chain.
Detailed Instructions
After bridging, you must verify execution and handle failures on the destination chain. The assets may arrive, but the subsequent action (e.g., swap, stake) requires the gas you provisioned. If gas funding fails, the transaction may be stuck in a pending state.
- Sub-step 1: Track the transaction hash. Use the bridge's provided transaction ID to monitor progress on both the source and destination block explorers. For example, an Arbitrum retryable ticket will have a unique
Ticket IDon L1 and a corresponding transaction hash on L2. - Sub-step 2: Check for completion or errors. On the destination chain, verify if the final transaction was included in a block. If it failed due to insufficient gas, you may need to manually submit it with additional gas. For retryable tickets, you have about one week to manually "redeem" them.
- Sub-step 3: Manually intervene if necessary. If automatic execution fails, you may need to interact directly with the destination chain contract. For an expired retryable ticket on Arbitrum, you would call the
Inbox.forceRedemptionfunction with the ticket ID.
bash# Example: Checking status of an Arbitrum retryable ticket via CLI cast call --rpc-url https://arb1.arbitrum.io/rpc 0x1bF5C82a9Defa5B7D8a5F4d8C7B7F2D6b5B7a8C9 \ "getRetryableTicket(bytes32 ticketId)(uint128,uint128,address,uint64,uint64,address,bytes)" \ 0x1234...abcd
Tip: Set up alerting (e.g., via Tenderly or OpenZeppelin Defender) for failed destination transactions to ensure you can respond within any time-sensitive windows for manual redemption.
Comparison of Gas Provisioning Solutions
Managing Gas on the Destination Chain When Bridging
| Feature | Manual Provisioning | Relayer Services | Gas Abstraction (Paymaster) |
|---|---|---|---|
User Experience | Complex; requires pre-funding destination wallet | Seamless; gas paid by relayer | Seamless; gas paid in source chain token |
Typical Cost to User | Destination chain gas fees + bridge fees | Bridge fees + relayer fee (e.g., 0.05% of tx value) | Bridge fees + paymaster fee (e.g., 0.1% of tx value) |
Speed | Slower; user must wait for initial funding | Fast; transaction submitted immediately | Fast; transaction submitted immediately |
Supported Chains Example | Arbitrum, Polygon, Base | Across, Socket, Li.Fi | Biconomy, Gelato, Pimlico |
Security Model | User-controlled; full custody of funds | Trust in relayer's execution | Trust in paymaster's sponsorship logic |
Gas Token Required | Yes (e.g., ETH on Arbitrum, MATIC on Polygon) | No | No |
Typical Use Case | Advanced users, large transfers | Retail users, frequent small transfers | dApps aiming for complete user abstraction |
Protocol Design Perspectives
Understanding Gas on the Destination Chain
When you bridge assets between blockchains, you must pay transaction fees, called gas, on the destination chain to claim or use your assets. This is a fundamental challenge because you start with funds only on the source chain. Gas management refers to the strategies protocols use to ensure users have the necessary funds to pay these fees.
Key Points
- Native vs. Bridged Assets: You typically need the destination chain's native token (like ETH on Ethereum or MATIC on Polygon) to pay gas. Your bridged assets (like USDC) cannot be used for gas until after you've paid to claim them.
- The Gas Problem: Without native tokens on the destination, you can't complete the transaction to receive your bridged funds, creating a chicken-and-egg dilemma.
- Common Solutions: Protocols like LayerZero and Axelar often offer "gas abstraction" services, where they may front the gas cost for you, later deducting it from your bridged amount.
Example
When using Wormhole, you might bridge USDC from Ethereum to Avalanche. To claim your USDC on Avalanche, you need AVAX for gas. If you don't have any, you might use a Wormhole-integrated app that provides a small amount of AVAX to complete the claim transaction, simplifying the process for you.
Developer Workflow: Integrating Gas Abstraction
Process overview for managing gas fees on the destination chain when bridging assets.
Estimate Destination Chain Gas Requirements
Calculate the gas needed for the transaction on the target blockchain.
Detailed Instructions
Before initiating a cross-chain transfer, you must accurately estimate the gas cost on the destination chain. This is crucial because the relayer or gas abstraction service will need to cover this cost. Use the destination chain's RPC provider to simulate the transaction.
- Sub-step 1: Construct the calldata for the intended action on the destination chain (e.g., a token swap or contract interaction).
- Sub-step 2: Call an estimation function like
eth_estimateGason the destination chain's RPC endpoint (e.g.,https://polygon-rpc.com). - Sub-step 3: Factor in a buffer (e.g., 20%) to account for gas price volatility and ensure the transaction does not fail.
Tip: For complex interactions, consider using a gas estimation library like
ethers.js'sestimateGasmethod on a populated transaction object.
Select and Configure a Gas Abstraction Provider
Choose a service to sponsor the destination chain gas fees.
Detailed Instructions
Integrate a gas abstraction provider like Biconomy, Gas Station Network (GSN), or a custom relayer. This entity will pay the gas on the destination chain, allowing your user to transact with only the source chain's native token.
- Sub-step 1: Register your dApp and obtain API keys or a Paymaster contract address from your chosen provider (e.g., Biconomy's dashboard).
- Sub-step 2: Configure your smart contract on the destination chain to be compatible with the provider's standards, such as implementing the
IForwarderinterface for GSN. - Sub-step 3: Set up the client-side SDK (e.g.,
@biconomy/ethers-lite) and initialize it with your provider credentials and chain IDs.
Tip: Ensure the provider supports the specific destination chain (e.g., Polygon, Arbitrum) and has sufficient funds in its Paymaster to cover user transactions.
Construct the Bridging Payload with Gas Data
Build the cross-chain message including gas sponsorship instructions.
Detailed Instructions
When creating the bridge transaction on the source chain, you must encode the gas abstraction parameters into the bridging payload. This tells the bridge and relayer how to handle gas on the other side.
- Sub-step 1: Encode the destination chain transaction calldata (from Step 1) and the estimated gas limit (e.g., 250,000 units).
- Sub-step 2: Specify the gas token address (e.g.,
0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000for native gas) and the refund address for any unused gas. - Sub-step 3: Use the bridge's SDK (e.g., SocketDL's
Bridgeclass) to build the transaction, passing the gas data object.
javascriptconst bridgeParams = { fromChainId: 1, // Ethereum toChainId: 137, // Polygon asset: tokenAddress, amount: '1000000000000000000', // 1 token userAddress: '0xUser...', gasLimit: '300000', gasToken: '0xEeeeeEeeeEeEeeEeEeEeeEEEeeeeEeeeeeeeEEeE', // Native gas placeholder };
Execute Bridge and Monitor Gas Sponsorship
Send the transaction and verify the gas was paid on the destination.
Detailed Instructions
Initiate the bridge transaction and monitor its progress through both chains, confirming the gas sponsorship was successful on the destination.
- Sub-step 1: Sign and send the bridge transaction from the user's wallet on the source chain. The user only pays gas for this initial transaction.
- Sub-step 2: Track the transaction using the bridge's transaction hash and a block explorer. Wait for the bridge's attestation or relayer to pick up the message.
- Sub-step 3: On the destination chain, verify the transaction was executed and that the gas fees were deducted from the Paymaster or relayer's balance, not the user's. Check the destination transaction receipt for the
fromfield to confirm it was the relayer address.
Tip: Implement webhook listeners or polling for bridge status updates (e.g., using SocketDL's status API endpoint) to provide real-time feedback in your UI.
Technical FAQs and Edge Cases
Calculating exact destination chain gas requires analyzing the target chain's current state, which is dynamic. You must estimate the gas for the final transaction, such as a token swap or contract interaction, not just the bridge receipt. Use the destination chain's gas estimation tools (like eth_estimateGas for EVM chains) in your wallet or bridging interface. For example, bridging to Arbitrum may require ~0.0005 ETH for a simple transfer, but a complex DeFi interaction could need 0.005 ETH. Always check real-time gas trackers like GasNow for the destination network and maintain a buffer of 10-20% above the estimate to prevent failed transactions.