ChainScore Labs
LABS
Guides

Impermanent Loss: A Deep Dive for LPs

A technical analysis of impermanent loss mechanics, its mathematical foundations, and practical strategies for liquidity providers.
Chainscore © 2025
core-concepts

Core Concepts and Definitions

An overview of the fundamental terms and mechanisms essential for understanding impermanent loss in decentralized finance liquidity pools.

01

Automated Market Maker (AMM)

Automated Market Makers (AMMs) are decentralized protocols that use mathematical formulas to price assets and facilitate trading without traditional order books. They allow users to become liquidity providers by depositing token pairs into liquidity pools.

  • Key feature: Uses a constant product formula (x * y = k) to determine prices algorithmically.
  • Real example: Uniswap and Curve are popular AMM platforms where LPs deposit assets like ETH/USDC.
  • Why it matters: AMMs are the foundational infrastructure where impermanent loss occurs, as pool token ratios must adjust to market price changes.
02

Liquidity Pool & LP Tokens

A Liquidity Pool is a smart contract containing two or more tokens that enable trading on an AMM. Depositing equal value of both assets grants the user LP Tokens, which represent their share and claim on the pool's fees.

  • Key feature: LP tokens are minted upon deposit and burned upon withdrawal to redeem the underlying assets.
  • Real example: Providing 1 ETH and 2000 USDC to a pool might grant you 100 UNI-V2 LP tokens.
  • Why it matters: The value of these LP tokens fluctuates based on pool composition, directly exposing LPs to impermanent loss versus simply holding the assets.
03

Constant Product Formula

The Constant Product Formula is the core pricing mechanism for many AMMs, stating that the product of the quantities of two tokens in a pool must remain constant (x * y = k).

  • Key feature: When one token is traded, its price increases relative to the other to maintain the constant k.
  • Real use case: If a pool has 100 ETH and 200,000 USDC (k=20,000,000), buying 1 ETH will increase its price and decrease the USDC reserve.
  • Why it matters: This automatic rebalancing is the mathematical root of impermanent loss, as LPs end up with more of the depreciating asset.
04

Price Divergence

Price Divergence refers to the change in the external market price ratio of the two assets in a liquidity pool compared to their ratio when initially deposited.

  • Key feature: Impermanent loss magnitude is directly proportional to the degree of this price divergence.
  • Real example: If ETH/USDC was 1:2000 when you deposited, but later moves to 1:3000 on external exchanges, a significant divergence has occurred.
  • Why it matters: This divergence forces the AMM to rebalance the pool, causing the LP's portfolio value to differ from a simple 'hold' strategy, creating the loss.
05

Portfolio Value Comparison

Portfolio Value Comparison is the method for quantifying impermanent loss by comparing the value of assets held in the liquidity pool versus the value if those assets were simply held in a wallet.

  • Key feature: Impermanent loss is not a realized loss until withdrawal; it's the opportunity cost of providing liquidity.
  • Real calculation: If holding would be worth $10,000 but your LP share is worth $9,500, the impermanent loss is $500 (or 5%).
  • Why it matters: This comparison helps LPs assess the true cost/benefit of providing liquidity, weighing potential fees against this temporary loss.

Calculating Impermanent Loss: A Step-by-Step Walkthrough

A detailed process for liquidity providers to quantify the opportunity cost of providing assets to an Automated Market Maker (AMM) pool compared to simply holding them.

1

Step 1: Define Initial Conditions and the Constant Product Formula

Establish the baseline state of your liquidity pool position.

Detailed Instructions

First, record your initial deposit into the liquidity pool. For a standard Constant Product Market Maker (CPMM) like Uniswap V2, the core rule is x * y = k, where x and y are the reserves of the two tokens, and k is a constant. Define your initial contribution. For example, if you deposit 1 ETH and 2000 USDC into an ETH/USDC pool when 1 ETH = $2000, your initial position is balanced.

  • Sub-step 1: Note the initial amounts: x_initial = 1 ETH, y_initial = 2000 USDC.
  • Sub-step 2: Calculate the initial pool share (P) you own. If the total pool had 10 ETH and 20,000 USDC, your share is 10% (1/10 of ETH).
  • Sub-step 3: Record the initial price of Asset A in terms of Asset B. Here, P_initial = y_initial / x_initial = 2000 USDC/ETH.

Tip: Always use the precise reserve amounts from the blockchain (e.g., via Etherscan for pool contract 0x...) at the time of deposit, not just the market price, as pool price can have slight divergence.

2

Step 2: Calculate the Value of Your LP Position After a Price Change

Determine the value of your pool tokens given new market prices.

Detailed Instructions

When the external market price of your assets changes, the pool's internal reserves rebalance via arbitrage. Suppose the price of ETH rises to $4000. First, the new pool reserves (x_new, y_new) must satisfy two conditions: 1) The constant product k is preserved, and 2) The pool price aligns with the new external market price (P_new = 4000).

  • Sub-step 1: Solve for new reserves. From x_new * y_new = k and y_new / x_new = P_new, we get x_new = sqrt(k / P_new) and y_new = sqrt(k * P_new). With our initial k = 1 * 2000 = 2000, x_new = sqrt(2000/4000) ≈ 0.7071 ETH, y_new = sqrt(2000*4000) ≈ 2828.43 USDC.
  • Sub-step 2: Calculate your portion. With a 10% pool share, you now own 0.07071 ETH and 282.843 USDC.
  • Sub-step 3: Value your LP position in a common currency (e.g., USD). Value = (0.07071 ETH * 4000) + 282.843 USDC = 565.686 USD.

Tip: This step shows the automatic rebalancing of the AMM. Your ETH holdings decreased while your USDC increased compared to your initial deposit.

3

Step 3: Calculate the Value of a Simple Hold Strategy

Determine what your assets would be worth if you had never provided liquidity.

Detailed Instructions

This is the crucial comparison point for impermanent loss. Calculate the value your initial token amounts would have if you simply held them in your wallet, subject to the new market price.

  • Sub-step 1: Take your initial asset amounts from Step 1: 1 ETH and 2000 USDC.
  • Sub-step 2: Apply the new market price (ETH = $4000) to the ETH portion. The value of held ETH is 1 ETH * 4000 = 4000 USDC.
  • Sub-step 3: Add the value of the held stablecoin, which remains 2000 USDC.
  • Sub-step 4: Total Hold Value = 4000 + 2000 = 6000 USD.

Compare this to your LP position value from Step 2 (≈565.686 USD). The difference is the opportunity cost. The formula for the hold value is straightforward:

code
hold_value = (x_initial * P_new) + y_initial

Using our numbers: (1 * 4000) + 2000 = 6000.

Tip: Impermanent loss is not a realized loss unless you withdraw. It becomes permanent upon exit.

4

Step 4: Compute the Impermanent Loss Percentage

Derive the percentage difference between the LP and Hold strategies.

Detailed Instructions

Now, quantify the impermanent loss (IL) as a percentage. The general formula for a two-asset CPMM pool is: IL % = [2 * sqrt(price_ratio) / (1 + price_ratio)] - 1, where price_ratio = P_new / P_initial.

  • Sub-step 1: Calculate the price ratio. In our example, price_ratio = 4000 / 2000 = 2.
  • Sub-step 2: Plug into the formula: IL % = [2 * sqrt(2) / (1 + 2)] - 1.
  • Sub-step 3: Compute: sqrt(2) ≈ 1.4142. So, [2 * 1.4142 / 3] - 1 = [2.8284 / 3] - 1 ≈ 0.9428 - 1 = -0.0572.
  • Sub-step 4: Convert to percentage: -5.72%. This means your LP position is worth approximately 5.72% less than your initial deposit would be if held.

You can verify using the absolute values from Steps 2 & 3: (LP_Value / Hold_Value) - 1 = (565.686 / 6000) - 1 ≈ 0.09428 - 1 = -0.0572.

code
// JavaScript function to calculate IL percentage
function impermanentLossPercent(P_initial, P_new) {
  const r = P_new / P_initial;
  return (2 * Math.sqrt(r) / (1 + r)) - 1;
}
console.log(impermanentLossPercent(2000, 4000)); // Outputs ~ -0.0572

Tip: This percentage is symmetric and depends only on the price ratio. A 2x price change results in ~5.72% IL, while a 3x change results in ~13.4% IL.

5

Step 5: Factor in Earned Fees to Find Net Position

Adjust the calculation to include trading fee revenue, which can offset impermanent loss.

Detailed Instructions

Impermanent loss is only one side of the equation. Liquidity providers earn a fraction of every trade (fee tier, e.g., 0.3% on Uniswap V2). To evaluate overall profitability, you must estimate fees earned during your deposit period.

  • Sub-step 1: Identify the pool's fee tier. For Uniswap V2 ETH/USDC pool 0xB4e16d0168e52d35CaCD2c6185b44281Ec28C9Dc, it's 0.3%.
  • Sub-step 2: Estimate your accrued fees. This requires historical data. You can query The Graph subgraph for the pool or use a block explorer to check your accumulated token0 and token1 fees in the pool contract over time.
  • Sub-step 3: Value the earned fees at the current market price. If you earned 0.01 ETH and 15 USDC in fees, their value at P_new=$4000 is (0.01*4000) + 15 = 55 USD.
  • Sub-step 4: Calculate Net LP Value = LP Position Value (Step 2) + Value of Earned Fees. In our example: 565.686 + 55 = 620.686 USD.
  • Sub-step 5: Compare Net LP Value to Hold Value (6000 USD). Here, fees have turned the position slightly profitable relative to holding.

Tip: In high-volume pools, fees can significantly mitigate or even outweigh impermanent loss. Always model fee income based on realistic volume projections for your pool.

Impermanent Loss Scenario Analysis

Comparison of IL outcomes for a 50/50 ETH/USDC pool under different price change scenarios over 30 days.

Price Change ScenarioHold in Wallet ValueProvide Liquidity ValueImpermanent Loss %

ETH +25% (to $3,750)

$12,500

$12,247

-2.02%

ETH +100% (to $6,000)

$15,000

$14,142

-5.72%

ETH -25% (to $2,250)

$7,500

$7,746

+3.28%

ETH -50% (to $1,500)

$5,000

$5,000

0.00%

ETH +300% (to $12,000)

$25,000

$21,213

-15.15%

ETH -75% (to $750)

$2,500

$2,500

0.00%

ETH +10%, USDC +5% (Correlated)

$10,750

$10,724

-0.24%

Strategic Perspectives for Different Participants

Understanding Your Role as a Liquidity Provider

Impermanent Loss (IL) is the temporary loss of value experienced by a liquidity provider when the price of the deposited assets changes compared to when they were deposited. It's 'impermanent' because the loss is only realized if you withdraw your liquidity during the price divergence.

Key Points to Grasp

  • Price Divergence is the Cause: IL occurs when the two assets in your pool, like ETH and USDC, change in price relative to each other. The greater the change, the larger the potential IL.
  • Compensation via Fees: You earn trading fees on every swap in the pool. The goal is for these accumulated fees to outweigh any impermanent loss over time, making your position profitable.
  • Stablecoin Pairs are Safer: Providing liquidity for pairs like USDC/DAI on a DEX like Curve Finance minimizes IL because both assets aim to maintain a 1:1 peg, leading to minimal price divergence.

Practical Example

When you deposit 1 ETH ($2,000) and 2,000 USDC into a Uniswap V3 pool, you own a share of that pool. If ETH's price doubles to $4,000, arbitrageurs will rebalance the pool, leaving you with less ETH and more USDC than you deposited. Your total value in USD may be higher than your initial $4,000, but it will be less than if you had simply held the 1 ETH and 2,000 USDC.

mitigation-techniques

Mitigation Techniques and Advanced Pool Designs

A comprehensive guide exploring sophisticated strategies and innovative liquidity pool architectures designed to protect Liquidity Providers from the financial impact of Impermanent Loss.

01

Concentrated Liquidity

Concentrated Liquidity allows LPs to allocate capital within a specific price range rather than the full 0 to infinity curve. This dramatically increases capital efficiency and fee earnings within that band.

  • LPs define an active price range (e.g., ETH between $1,800 and $2,200)
  • Higher fee generation per dollar deposited due to concentrated depth
  • Platforms like Uniswap V3 pioneered this model
  • This matters as it lets LPs express a market view and maximize returns on predictable assets, though it requires active management.
02

Dynamic Fee Tiers

Dynamic Fee Tiers adjust pool commission rates based on market volatility and asset pair risk. Higher volatility pairs command higher fees to compensate LPs for increased Impermanent Loss risk.

  • Fees can range from 0.01% for stablecoin pairs to 1%+ for exotic altcoins
  • Automated by protocols like Balancer V2 using volatility oracles
  • Example: A volatile ETH/ALT pool might have a 0.3% fee vs. 0.05% for USDC/DAI
  • This directly aligns LP compensation with risk, creating a more sustainable incentive structure.
03

Impermanent Loss Insurance

Impermanent Loss Insurance is a nascent DeFi primitive where LPs pay a premium to hedge against potential IL. Protocols or dedicated insurers cover a portion of the loss if it materializes.

  • Works like an options contract or mutualized risk pool
  • Platforms such as Unslashed Finance and Sherlock offer related coverage
  • LP deposits funds and pays periodic premiums for coverage
  • This matters as it provides a safety net, enabling more conservative LPs to participate in volatile pools with greater confidence.
04

Single-Sided Staking & Vaults

Single-Sided Staking lets users provide only one asset to a liquidity pool, eliminating direct exposure to a second volatile asset. Managed vaults handle the pairing and complex strategies automatically.

  • User deposits only ETH, and the vault pairs it algorithmically
  • Popularized by yield aggregators like Yearn Finance and Beefy Finance
  • The vault manages hedging, rebalancing, and fee harvesting
  • This simplifies participation for users, reduces manual complexity, and can use derivatives to mitigate inherent IL risk.
05

Stablecoin & Correlated Asset Pools

Stablecoin & Correlated Asset Pools pair assets with very low price divergence, such as stablecoins (USDC/DAI) or wrapped versions of the same asset (wBTC/renBTC). This minimizes the root cause of Impermanent Loss.

  • Price ratios remain near 1:1, so IL is negligible
  • Examples include Curve Finance's stablecoin pools and wBTC/sBTC pools
  • These pools earn substantial fees from low-slippage swaps
  • This is a foundational, low-risk strategy for LPs seeking predictable yield from trading volume with minimal IL concern.
06

Rebalancing & Range Management Tools

Rebalancing & Range Management Tools are automated services that adjust an LP's position in response to market moves. They help maintain optimal capital allocation within a concentrated liquidity range without constant manual intervention.

  • Automatically shifts price ranges as the market trends
  • Services like Charm Finance's Alpha Vaults offer this
  • Uses limit orders and periodic rebalancing strategies
  • This matters immensely for active strategies, as it helps capture fees consistently and reduces the risk of capital becoming inactive outside its range.

Frequently Asked Questions & Nuanced Cases

Impermanent loss is the opportunity cost incurred by liquidity providers when the price ratio of the two assets in a pool diverges from the ratio at the time of deposit. It's a result of the constant product formula (x*y=k) that automated market makers use. When one asset appreciates relative to the other, the AMM automatically rebalances the pool by selling the appreciating asset and buying the depreciating one to maintain the constant k. This means you end up with more of the worse-performing asset and less of the better-performing one compared to simply holding. For example, if you deposit 1 ETH ($2,000) and 2,000 USDC into a 50/50 pool and ETH's price doubles to $4,000, you would have less than 0.707 ETH and more than 2,828 USDC. If you had simply held, you'd have 1 ETH ($4,000) and $2,000 USDC. The IL here is the difference in total portfolio value between the two scenarios.

Further Reading and Tools

Impermanent Loss Explained

Clear conceptual overview of impermanent loss mechanics and examples

Visit resource

Uniswap Documentation: Fees and Impermanent Loss

Official Uniswap protocol documentation discussing fees and impermanent loss considerations for LPs

Visit resource

Impermanent Loss Calculator

Interactive tool to calculate impermanent loss across different price scenarios

Visit resource

Bancor Guide to Impermanent Loss

In-depth explanation of impermanent loss and how different AMM designs address it

Visit resource
Chat on Telegram
Chat on WhatsApp