An overview of the core technological and economic shifts enabling the next generation of decentralized exchanges, moving beyond simple AMMs to more intelligent, user-centric trading systems.
LABS
Guides
The Future of DEXs: Intents, Solvers, and AI Integration
An architectural analysis of next-generation decentralized exchange mechanisms moving beyond the AMM model.
Chainscore © 2025
core-concepts
Foundational Concepts
01
Intents
Intents are high-level, declarative expressions of a user's desired outcome, rather than explicit transaction instructions. This shifts the burden of execution complexity from the user to the network.
- Users specify what they want (e.g., 'buy X token at best price'), not how to achieve it.
- Enables complex, multi-step trades across multiple liquidity sources in a single, gas-efficient operation.
- Realized by projects like UniswapX and CowSwap, which use solvers to fulfill these intents.
- This matters as it abstracts away blockchain complexity, offering a simpler, more powerful user experience akin to traditional finance.
02
Solvers & the Solver Network
Solvers are specialized, often competitive, agents that compete to find the optimal execution path for a user's intent. They form a decentralized Solver Network that drives efficiency.
- Solvers analyze liquidity across DEXs, bridges, and private pools to find the best route.
- They submit bundles of transactions, and a winning solver is chosen based on criteria like price and speed.
- Examples include the solver ecosystem powering CowSwap and proposed systems for Uniswap v4.
- This competitive market reduces prices for users and incentivizes continuous innovation in execution strategies.
03
AI-Powered Execution
Artificial Intelligence is being integrated to supercharge solver capabilities and predictive analytics, moving beyond rule-based algorithms.
- ML models can predict price slippage, MEV opportunities, and optimal transaction timing with greater accuracy.
- AI agents can dynamically adjust trading strategies based on real-time market sentiment and on-chain data.
- Use cases include AI-driven liquidity management for LPs and intelligent order routing that learns from past performance.
- This matters as it pushes the boundaries of execution quality, potentially offering returns and efficiencies impossible with traditional algorithms.
04
Modular Architecture & Specialization
The future DEX stack is becoming modular, separating the roles of order flow, solving, and settlement across specialized layers.
- Intent-centric protocols handle user interaction and intent expression.
- Solver networks operate as a separate competition layer for execution.
- Underlying blockchains (like Ethereum) or dedicated settlement layers (e.g., based on rollups) finalize transactions.
- This modularity, seen in architectures like CoW Protocol, allows for rapid innovation at each layer without monolithic upgrades.
- It creates a more resilient and efficient system where the best solutions for each function can emerge.
05
Enhanced User Sovereignty
This new paradigm fundamentally enhances user sovereignty by giving traders more control and better guarantees without requiring expert-level knowledge.
- Users set constraints and preferences (e.g., price limits, time deadlines) that solvers must strictly adhere to.
- Systems like MEV protection become built-in, as solvers are incentivized to find the user the best net outcome, not extract value.
- Realized through concepts like 'guaranteed execution' where the user's intent is a binding contract for the solver network.
- This shifts power back to the end-user, making DeFi trading safer, fairer, and more accessible.
The Intent-Based Trading Lifecycle
A process overview for executing trades on next-generation DEXs using user intents, specialized solvers, and AI-driven optimization.
1
Step 1: Intent Declaration
The user expresses their desired trading outcome in natural language or structured parameters.
Detailed Instructions
Users begin by declaring their trading intent rather than a specific transaction. This is a high-level goal, such as "Swap 1 ETH for the best possible amount of USDC within 30 seconds, minimizing MEV risk." This intent is signed and submitted to a public mempool or a specialized intent pool. The system parses this into structured data, identifying key constraints and preferences.
- Sub-step 1: Define Parameters: Specify asset (e.g.,
tokenIn: 0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2), amount (amountIn: 1e18), desired output token, and any conditions like deadlines or slippage. - Sub-step 2: Add Preferences: Include optional preferences like
prefer: cowswaporavoid: uniswap_v2to guide solver selection. - Sub-step 3: Sign & Broadcast: Sign the intent message with your private wallet (e.g., using
eth_signTypedData_v4) and broadcast it to a network of solvers via an RPC endpoint.
Tip: Use intent-specific SDKs like
@cowprotocol/widget-sdkto easily generate and sign compliant intent objects from your dApp interface.
2
Step 2: Solver Competition & Route Discovery
A network of specialized solvers competes to find the optimal execution path for the declared intent.
Detailed Instructions
Upon receiving the intent, a decentralized network of solvers (bots or specialized nodes) enters a competition. Their goal is to discover the most efficient execution path that satisfies all user constraints, which may involve complex multi-hop swaps, cross-chain bridges, or private order flow auctions. Solvers use off-chain computation to simulate thousands of potential routes across integrated DEXs (Uniswap, Curve, Balancer) and liquidity sources.
- Sub-step 1: Route Simulation: Each solver runs simulations using local forks or services like Tenderly. For example:
simulation = await tenderly.simulate(swapRoute, blockNumber). - Sub-step 2: AI-Powered Optimization: Advanced solvers employ reinforcement learning models to predict fee fluctuations and liquidity changes, optimizing for final output or gas cost.
- Sub-step 3: Bundle Construction: The winning solver constructs a transaction bundle that may include proprietary liquidity or MEV protection techniques, ensuring the user's intent is fulfilled atomically.
Tip: The competition is often time-bound (e.g., 12-second epochs), ensuring rapid response. Users benefit from this competition without paying for failed solver computations.
3
Step 3: Solution Submission & Settlement
The winning solver's proposed transaction is submitted on-chain, and the trade is settled atomically.
Detailed Instructions
The solver that formulates the best solution (e.g., highest output for the user, often for a fee) submits its transaction bundle to a settlement layer or a shared settlement contract like CowSwap's GPv2Settlement (0x9008D19f58AAbD9eD0D60971565AA8510560ab41). This contract acts as a trusted neutral party, verifying the solution meets the intent's constraints before execution. This step ensures atomic settlement, meaning the entire trade either succeeds completely or fails, protecting users from partial fills.
- Sub-step 1: On-Chain Verification: The settlement contract decodes the calldata and checks constraints:
require(block.timestamp <= deadline, "Deadline exceeded"); - Sub-step 2: Execution: The contract executes the swap, transferring funds from the user and solver's accounts directly. For example, it might call
uniswapV3Router.exactInputSingle(params). - Sub-step 3: Fee Distribution: The solver's fee (e.g., 5 basis points) is deducted from the output, and the remaining tokens are sent to the user's specified
recipientaddress.
Tip: Users never sign the execution transaction itself, only the intent. This shifts gas payment and execution risk to the solver, simplifying the user experience.
4
Step 4: Post-Settlement Analysis & AI Feedback Loop
The outcome is analyzed to improve future intent matching and solver performance through AI models.
Detailed Instructions
After settlement, the entire lifecycle data is recorded for analysis. This includes the intent parameters, the winning route, gas used, final exchange rate, and any MEV extraction that was prevented. This data feeds into a continuous AI feedback loop where machine learning models are retrained to better predict liquidity, optimize routing, and protect users. Platforms may offer users a detailed receipt via APIs.
- Sub-step 1: Data Aggregation: Events are indexed from the settlement contract. A query might fetch logs:
SELECT * FROM settlement_events WHERE user = '0xUserAddress'. - Sub-step 2: Performance Scoring: Solvers are scored based on execution quality (e.g.,
score = (outputAmount / estimatedOutput) * 100). High-performing solvers earn more rewards and future priority. - Sub-step 3: Model Retraining: New data trains intent-parsing NLP models and route-pricing RL models, making the system smarter for the next intent. For instance, a model might learn that intents for "large WBTC swaps" are best routed through Balancer pools after block 20,000,000.
Tip: Users can often query their intent history via subgraph endpoints to audit performance and understand the true cost of their trades, including hidden price impact.
DEX Architecture Comparison: AMM vs. Intent-Based
Comparison of core architectural features between traditional Automated Market Makers and emerging Intent-Based systems, highlighting the role of solvers and AI.
| Architectural Feature | Traditional AMM (e.g., Uniswap V3) | Intent-Based DEX (e.g., CowSwap, UniswapX) | Role of AI Integration |
|---|---|---|---|
Trade Execution Logic | Constant product formula (x*y=k) or concentrated liquidity pools | User submits intent (e.g., 'sell 1 ETH for max USDC'); off-chain solvers compete to fulfill | AI solvers optimize for complex intents, route across multiple venues, and predict optimal settlement timing |
Liquidity Source | On-chain liquidity pools (capital locked in smart contracts) | Aggregated liquidity from all on-chain DEXs & private market makers (RFQ systems) | AI models predict liquidity shifts and suggest optimal solver strategies for sourcing |
User Experience & Control | Specify exact input/output amounts; exposed to MEV and slippage | Declarative 'what' not 'how'; express preferences (e.g., price, privacy); protection from MEV | Natural language intent parsing (e.g., 'swap for vacation funds by Friday'), personalized strategy recommendations |
Settlement & Finality | Atomic, on-chain swap in single transaction | Batch auctions settled periodically (e.g., every 30 seconds) for efficiency and MEV capture | AI coordinates cross-chain intent settlement and optimizes gas fees across batched transactions |
Fee Structure | LP fees (0.01%-1%), plus network gas costs | Solver competition for fee (to user) + potential protocol fee; often gasless for user | Dynamic fee prediction and recommendation based on intent complexity and network state |
Key Innovation | Permissionless liquidity provision and price discovery via algorithm | Separation of order flow (intent) from execution (solver competition) | Autonomous, adaptive solvers that learn from historical data to improve fill rates and prices |
Stakeholder Perspectives
Understanding the New DEX Landscape
Intents are the core concept shifting how users interact with decentralized exchanges. Instead of specifying the exact steps of a trade (like on Uniswap v3), you simply state your desired outcome, such as "I want the best price for 1 ETH in USDC." A network of specialized solvers then competes to find the most efficient path across multiple liquidity pools to fulfill your request, often resulting in better prices and lower fees for you.
Key Points
- User Experience: Trading becomes as simple as stating a goal. You no longer need to manually split orders or hunt for the best pool.
- AI Integration: Advanced solvers use artificial intelligence to predict market movements and optimize trade routing in real-time, potentially offering you prices that manual trading cannot match.
- Real-World Analogy: Think of it like using a travel aggregator (e.g., Kayak) instead of booking each flight and hotel separately. You state your destination and budget, and the solver finds the best combination.
Example
When using a DEX like CowSwap or UniswapX, you would simply submit an intent. A solver might then route part of your trade through a Uniswap pool, another part through a Balancer vault, and even include a limit order on a CEX to get you the final, optimal result, all without you lifting a finger.
ai-integration
AI Integration and Optimization
Exploring how artificial intelligence is fundamentally reshaping decentralized exchanges by enhancing user experience, optimizing trade execution, and creating new market dynamics through advanced intent-based architectures and solver networks.
01
Intent-Based Architectures
User-centric transaction models shift the paradigm from specifying complex transaction steps to simply declaring a desired outcome. This allows AI to handle the intricate routing and execution logic behind the scenes.
- Users express goals like 'get the best price for 1 ETH' without manual route finding
- AI interprets the intent and formulates the optimal transaction path across multiple liquidity pools
- Reduces user error and technical barriers, making DeFi accessible to a broader audience
02
AI-Powered Solvers
Specialized agents compete to fulfill user intents by finding the most efficient execution paths. They act as the computational engine for intent-based systems, optimizing for cost, speed, and reliability.
- Solvers use machine learning to predict gas fees and liquidity shifts across chains
- Example: An AI solver might batch hundreds of swap intents into a single optimized transaction to minimize costs for all users
- Creates a competitive marketplace for execution quality, driving better outcomes for end-users
03
Predictive Liquidity Management
AI-driven market making uses predictive analytics to anticipate liquidity needs and optimize capital efficiency for liquidity providers (LPs). This moves beyond static Automated Market Makers (AMMs).
- Algorithms analyze trading patterns and cross-chain activity to pre-position assets
- Example: An AI could dynamically adjust pool fees or incentivize liquidity in anticipation of a major token launch
- Increases LP yields and reduces slippage for traders by ensuring liquidity is available where and when it's needed
04
Personalized Trading Agents
Autonomous wallet assistants learn individual user preferences and risk profiles to execute complex, multi-step DeFi strategies automatically. They act as a personal financial co-pilot.
- An agent could manage yield farming, hedging, and portfolio rebalancing based on user-defined goals
- Uses on-chain and social sentiment data to alert users to opportunities or risks
- Empowers users to execute sophisticated strategies without constant manual monitoring and interaction
05
Cross-Chain Intent Orchestration
Seamless multi-chain execution where AI coordinates actions across different blockchains to fulfill a single user intent, abstracting away the underlying complexity of bridges and heterogeneous networks.
- A user intent to 'borrow USDC at the lowest rate' might involve sourcing collateral on Ethereum and drawing debt on Avalanche
- AI evaluates security, speed, and cost of all possible cross-chain routes
- Unlocks true interoperability, allowing users to access the best opportunities across the entire crypto ecosystem effortlessly
06
Security & MEV Optimization
AI for threat detection and value extraction safeguards users and improves their net results by analyzing transaction flow for malicious patterns and beneficial opportunities like Maximum Extractable Value (MEV).
- Machine learning models identify and flag potential sandwich attacks or scam tokens in real-time
- Solvers can use AI to capture and redistribute positive MEV (e.g., arbitrage) back to the users who created the opportunity
- Shifts the MEV landscape from a predatory model to a more equitable, user-beneficial system
Challenges and Critical Questions
Intents shift the paradigm from explicit transaction execution to a declarative model of user goals, which introduces new security vectors. Instead of signing a specific swap, a user signs a statement of desired outcome, delegating pathfinding and execution to solvers. This creates a trust assumption in the solver network to act honestly and efficiently. For example, a malicious solver could exploit MEV (Miner Extractable Value) by front-running the user's intent or providing a suboptimal route. While systems like CowSwap and UniswapX use batch auctions and solver competition to mitigate this, the user ultimately relies on the solver's reputation and the protocol's incentive design, a significant departure from the non-custodial, self-executed trade.